Sending a message to the MLPA Initiative, local, state, and federal representatives, and others with influence shows that the fishing community will not be ignored while other interests have their ideas considered uncontested. By making our concerns, questions, and ideas heard we ensure that the fishing community will have somewhere to fish in the future.
You are also encouraged to email your state and federal representatives. While the DFG and MLPA Initiative have been tasked with creating the MPAs they are still subject to approval by appointees of our elected representatives. With the proper motivation these representatives will get involved. Here are some links to find your representative:
In order to prevent spamming of this service users are required to provide a valid email address. Upon submitting your message an email will be sent to you so that we can confirm your email address. In the email we send to you will be a link that you need to click to confirm and finalize the sending of your message.
ROGER HERRICK from SAN CLEMENTE, CA wrote Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Because there are fewer people that actually fish. The masses do not understand how beautiful and fun this is. Although i am an army of one in this letter, It is most important that we do not reduce this natural beauty of fishing. The boats were there long before any complaints. This is our coast and fishing is a long standing recreation that again was there long before the complaints from some complaint driven few. STOP THEM!! LET FISHING REMAIN!
The heritage of Orange County as it realtes to its Harbors and Beaches is to allow fishing , it is why our harbors are filled every year with Boat Owners and those wanting to go out on boats to fish.
Roger Herrick
Fisherman
And Son
Alexander
Fisherman
November 16, 2009, 6:17 PM
Donna Kalez from San Clemente wrote Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, to say :
Dear Governor-
Please help fisheries in Orange County , the Laguna Beach Coastline is facing a never before seen total fishing closure of a 5 mile stretch of the coast FOREVER. Closing of beach access to thousands of people and not allowing fishing of anykind is crazy! The heritage of Orange County as it realtes to its Harbors and Beaches is to allow fishing , it is why our harbors are filled every year with Boat Owners and those wanting to go out on boats to fish . Closing any amount to fishing will force people to leave California and go to Mexico , they will boycott buying licenses and the effect on Tourism will be devastating. I know that you value the tourist and love to see them come to california. Please suggest closures that are smart and will nt hurt the economy more then needed , please push for MAP 2 and keep jobs and revenue in california. We need your help , you created this not to hurt jobs or the economy!
Thank you
November 10, 2009, 10:16 PM
Nick from Encinitas wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
To whom it may concern,
Let me start off by saying that I am an environmentalist. There is no doubt that we need to protect and nurture natural ecosystems, and I economically support organizations that do just that. There are various theories and lots of data related to how this can best be accomplished. I understand where the motivation comes from to try to seperate nature from man, however, I believe in this case it is not necessary and counterproductive. Creating areas of coast that are strictly off-limits should be an absolute last resort and the biological data and anecdotal evidence does not show these ecosystems to be depleted or unhealthy to the point that they should be closed off. In my mind, this is an over the top reaction that is short-sighted, let me explain.
Nature needs friends. Fishing and hunting are ways man interacts with nature. Nobody appreciates a resource as much as someone who draws inspiration from it. Fisherman gain intuition from the natural surroundings that they interact with on a daily basis; nobody is more in tune with these particular areas that they frequent. I became an environmentalist because fishing taught me many things that I otherwise would not have been able to appreciate. I learned how intricate, delicate, and mysterious nature is and I learned how to improve myself as a person by drawing inspiration from the divinity that surrounded me when I was fly fishing in the sierra nevada or kayak fishing off La Jolla. By feeling alone and awestruck by the wonderous natural world I was immersed in I was forced to look into myself and see who I truly was and what my strengths and flaws were. I am a better person today because of my interaction with nature and I know many people who can say the same thing. This is good for people and society in general.
Is simply deciding to set aside huge chunks of our amazing coastline a wise environmental decision? What will result from this.
1) the same amount or more (CA is growing) fisherman will be fishing in a much smaller coastal area thereby diminishing the quality of their experience
2) many ocean related businesses will be negatively impacted
3) many people will have to travel furthur to fish making them less likely to go in the first place
4) an already healthy ecosystem may become a little bit healthier by having these pockets of protected areas where wildlife can flourish unmolested
In summary, closing these areas would be a bad decision. These special places need sound regulation and protection and lots of friends who appreciate them, they dont need isolation.
Sincerely,
Nick Terlecky
Encinitas, CA
October 23, 2009, 1:09 AM
michael byrum from lakewood Cal,90713 wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
i was molested as a child.My father left me when i was a child around 2 years old.My mother was what you would call a loser ,living off of the system ,into drugs ,abusive relationships that effected me as well.the list goes on.either way percentage rates shown that my history and environment has a 75 to 95 percent rate of failure in society .I actually almost ended up in this system of drugs,prison,violence,failure in society,etc.I still to this day have a felony that haunts my life because of my upbringing.I could have been locked into our judicial system indefinately if it hadn't have been for my uncles teaching me the values of our wildlife through fishing and hunting.I still to this day have never really taken home much in the way of trophies , but what i took home in experiences, memories and values far exceeded all that.It actually took me from one spectrum to the other in the manner that i now own my own business in the marine industry,i have a beautiful family,and i owe it all to the fact that i had a healthy alternative to turn towards to like saltwaterfishing besides drugs and violence .what im getting at is that there are thousands of kids out there with far worse stories than mine that can have the same or better results than i did .by implementing MLPA's you shut down all hope to those that have a chance.that just need a guiding hand like i received.I now the opportunity to teach my daughter these same values along with some more ive learned down the line .please dont take these rights away from me .there is a commom ground that we can all come to ,like growout pens that anglers support without the help of so called environmentalist that support MPA's.If we can just work together as a team to satisfy eachother and not destroy our coastal economy which myself and my family are completely dependent upon that would be great .just remember there not the environmentalist,we are.Were the ones that pay millions ,we give back to the oceans through growout pens on our own,we make this struggling economy survive,at the same time keeping values at heart
October 16, 2009, 10:16 AM
Frank Buehlmaier from Poway, CA wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Hello,
First, let me say that been a fresh water fisherman most of my life. This year a light bulb came on and it occured that I love boating and fishing and live 30 minutes from the biggest lake in the world. So I bought a boat.
I have been out in the waters off Point Loma, La Jolla, and in the San Diego harbor many times this year. The thing that becomes obvious when you out in these waters is that most of the time you are alone. Even on the biggest weekends with optimal weather there are not scores of fisherman hammering the local fish populations. I have yet to keep any of the fish we have caught.
After reading much of what has been written about the MLPA closures and watching the hearings etc it occurs to me that pro closure folks are not offering any real data to justify the proposals.
Here are the questions that need to be asked.
1. Where are the population studies for each species of fish?
2. How do the populations today compare to prior years, 5, 10, 20 years ago?
3. What impact is recreational fishing having on the population of each species of fish?
4. How does the health of the kelp beds compare to prior years, 5, 10, 20 years ago?
Where is the data? Where is the data? Where is the data?
If the environmentalists had there way we wouldn\'t be allowed in the ocean, in the forests, or the deserts. If these closures continue it will only be the beginning. These people won\'t stop, ever.
What\'s California without the Pacific Ocean?
How many industries will be negatively impacted by this? Boat dealers, bait shops, tackle shops, sporting goods retaliers and a whole host of other jobs and industries.
California can\'t afford to continue going backwards. The state is bankrupt already. These closures will accomplish nothing positive. The only thing they will accomplish is making a few maniacs happy.
Please make the right decision for California. The proposed MLPA closures are the wrong decision for California. It\'s time to wake up and get a clue.
Thanks
Frank Buehlmaier
October 15, 2009, 7:31 PM
henry goebel from goleta, ca wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
I feel after watching this process(s) unfold that it is very flawed and extremely politicalized. I have been both a commercial and sport fisherman for over 30 years and feel that other alternatives should be considered, such as limiting take number (reduction) and size increases. This process will impact many people is such a negative way and it is such a major drastic proposal. The only option I would consider supporting is proposal 2 and I still have reservations in that support.
Consider alternatives as mentioned above and then use exact science that is not providing a livelyhood for grant writers and at the same time NOT taking away from people who respect and protect this environment and yet do not call themselves environmentalists or special interest groups who do not spend time on the water.
October 13, 2009, 9:58 PM
Debra Robertson from Rolling Hills Estates, CA wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
I am in favor of map 2
September 28, 2009, 1:33 PM
Mark Navas from Simi Valley, CA. 93065 wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
I've been following the MPLA process and have found that there are many critical errors in its implementation. The proposed closures "No Take" zones have not address the real issues which are commercial over fishing, water pollution and daily recreational take limits to protect the species there.
Closing sections of the ocean to people is the worst case scenario here and should not happen. Please push for recreational and commercial take limits to be reduced instead of a complete closure. Ex: Change the daily limit on Kelp bass from 10/day to 3/day, etc. That alone will help the fish populations. Banning me from the ocean is just not right since they have not tried the easy fix first.
This MPLA process is driven by environmentalists special interest dollars to close these areas but no dollars are there to enforce the area nor do scientific studies to prove that these closures actually are necessary. I've been fishing the ocean in Nor Cal and So Cal for the past 22 years and can say by closing these areas will be a major step backward to California.
Please do the right thing and stop this madness!
Best regards,
Mark Navas
Simi Valley, CA.
September 17, 2009, 6:23 PM
JON from FALCONE wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
To whom it may concern,
As a Veteran of the war in Afghanistan I have returned home to California to enjoy the freedoms afforded me by this great nation and state. As I am sure you can imagine, it has been quite difficult to find solace after such an \"intense\" experience. However, fishing has proven to provide me with a relaxing, rewarding, and healthy option in dealing with post war stresses. Unfortunately, it has been brought to my attention that my ability to enjoy the peace of mind offered by a simple and healthy day of fishing is being threatened by overly zealous, borderline fascist, Eco-crusaders in an attempt to strip me of my right to purse an age old American past time. My own humble needs aside, I urge you to consider the health and welfare of LT Col. Hernandezs\' 6,000 marines who also will suffer from this potential travesty.
I will concede that the commercial fishing industries wasteful practices need to be revamped for the sake of our fisheries and overall health of our oceans... But please do not allow the issue\'s to be misconstrued or convoluted by wealthy land owners or fanatical environmentalists. I find it absurd that you would consider stripping hard working, law abiding, tax paying Americans of their right to fish their local waters and equally absurd to implement these proposed closures while taxing the entire state to enforce them.
I respectfully urge you to please reconsider the closing of our Public waterways to Sport Fishing and to direct your attention to the real issues facing California such as our budget and revenue, or lack there of...
Sincerely,
Jon Falcone
One Salty (Taxpaying) Fisherman
September 8, 2009, 5:37 PM
Christian Hernandez from Portola hills,Ca wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Dear Leaders and Wild life Organizations,
My name is Christian Hernandez and I/we have a big issue with your soon to be fishing laws. I represent over 6000 marines and Navy personnel that currently fish on the banks you are thinking of closing for what ever reason. We need this relaxiting nad enjoyable hobby to get us away from missing our families back home.I as you to reconsider the closing of our beaches for fishing purposes. We are currently running a pettition here on bae and you guys are getting closer to being put on television and be asked for an answer to our questions. How can you look your self in the mirrow every day and take this away from us the hard working people of the Armed Forces.
I look forward to your responce.
Sincerely,
Christian Hernandez
LT Col.USMC
September 7, 2009, 2:17 AM
David Rosenthal from Encino, CA wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
I am completely astounded that closing massive areas of our coastline are being considered. The economic impact to state and local coffers will just add to the out of control recession that California is experiencing. The income lost from the purchases of fishing tackle, boats, registration, fuel, fishing licenses, parking, tow vehicles and many other items used for our love of the sport will cost California Billions in a short period of time.
The majority of recreational anglers are the true conservationists and it is in our best interests to protect our resources. Out of the last 1000+ Calico Bass I have caught I have maybe kept 10-20 of them. On all of our charters we only keep half (if that) of the legal limit and impose slot limits upon ourselves. There are tens of thousands of other anglers that follow the same practices.
My best memories in my life are those of fishing with my Grandfather & my Father who would take me out on the boats even though he turned green looking at a bathtub. Someday I hope to share the same experiences with my children & nephews (Without the seasickness of course).
Please consider the motivation behind the organizations that are pushing for these closures. They do not use the resource and most have never spent a day on the water. They are just against fishing period.
One thing to really keep in mind is that there are millions of anglers in California that are also voters and left with no alternative WE will vote and show our dissatisfaction with how those that we have given the privilege to represent us have sold us out for their special interests. In other words, you will be out of a job.
With California already 20+ Billion in the hole can you really afford to lose a very reliable income source? There will be no money for enforcement. Personally my contribution to the fishing industry & supporting industries is around $10,000 per year. I have many friends that they easily spend double or even triple that. Again, can California really afford to lose this industry?
These are some of the business that will be hurt by these closures:
Sport Fishing Landings
Boat owners
Tackle Shops
Boat Dealers
Fuel Suppliers
Marinas
Launch Ramps (Cities)
Tackle Manufacturers
Fishing Tackle Trade Shows
The venues that host fishing tackle trade shows.
CA DMV Due to reduction of Registration of boats & trailers
Department of Fish & Game - Around 2 Million licenses are sold every year in CA. At around $40 plus the various stamps that adds up to a nice chunk of change. Personally I think that $80 Million+ a year is a lot of money.
Then CA gets to pay for all the people that will be unemployed as well.
Overall the passing of the MPA/MLPA is not very smart for CA as well as the careers of our elected officials.
If I was an elected official I would be more concerned about the plethora of other serious issues that are facing our state & country right now, not taking away the rights of the citizens that have put us in power and keep funding us.
Sincerely,
David Rosenthal
West Coast Angler
http://www.westcoastangler.com/
September 5, 2009, 4:21 AM
Robert Benner from San Diego, CA wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Please do not let this act take place. I have been fishing for years and I now have a four year old son to share the joys of fishing with. He wakes me up on my days off and asks if he can go fishing with me. He loves going fishing and the time we get to spend together is something so precious to both of us. We practice catch and release and we just love the sport of it. Like many others we pick up after other people also while out on the beach. We are not harming anything and we just want to continue enjoying fishing with each other. This plan would hurt a lot of people in a lot of different ways including our economy here in California. Many small tackle shop owners rely on us to keep their stores running and by shutting down our fishing spots we would no longer need to shop these tackle stores. This plan hurts everyone and helps no one. Studies have shown this plan is not needed, I and others hope that you also see that this plan is not needed and should not be passed. Let me continue to spend time with my son the way my father spent time with me, let us fish. That is all we ask, LET US FISH, please. Thank you for your time.
SIncerely,
Robert and Nicholas Benner
September 3, 2009, 6:15 PM
ZAC SMITH from Cypress wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
I think that the mlpa is a farce. You guys think that it is cool to use hard earned money that us poor fisherman save up every year to buy a state licence that is way over priced for the closer of our fishing areas for no dam good reason. I find this to be a slap in the face, and think that all this money that california is trying to find to fund things should come out of the pockets of the governer and all of the other officials. As a law abiding citizen and an avid fisherman I think you sould worry more about the fucking thousands of miles of houses that you guys have sitting in areas like riverside and yuca valley that have turned in to a forcloser night mare and turned those citys in to moder stly ghost towns. All that land that was used for the so called houseing boom now all sit in disrapare and no one can afford to up keep it. I feel that the MLPA is just one of those laws that is hiding under all the other shit that is really important and should be brought to be voted on by the people of california and not buy some gay ass committee that doesent have to pay for it. You guys have no right to change the history of california and if you close these areas that is what you are doing is stoping future generations from fallowing there ancestors foot steps
August 28, 2009, 6:44 PM
Jason Parker from Clairemont, CA wrote Pro-Fishing State Senators, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Hello,
I have been watching this MPA process and attended a number of meetings as well as the community open houses. I enjoy fishing and consider myself a hardcore fisherman. I eat what I catch and I support reducing existing bag limits to "consumptive" levels.
I am tired of the rhetoric and mob mentality that is being pushed onto fishermen. I have read a lot of materials on MPAs and I support the concept. A lot of fishermen don't read the science.
The process is working. Some don't like it because they aren't controlling the outcome. But it is working.
Stay the course. California needs these MPAs, and more.
Jason
May 8, 2009, 12:38 AM
jerry corder from Unknown wrote Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
I have been fishing southern California’s coastline for 18 years as a responsible angler whom actively practices safe catch and release, and harvests much less than the current slot limits allow. Doing so, I feel I actively contribute to a sustainable fishery, which is the intent of protectionism, the “P” in MLPA.
Acts such as the MLPA penalize responsible saltwater recreational users, i.e. boaters, divers, and anglers by creating an “off-limits” of an ecosystem all the while damaging and ignoring the economic engines that could be used to support active protection and recovery programs for targeted ecosystems, and species within them.
Examples; The black sea bass was fished to near extinction in southern CA, however the DFG enacted a no take law to have it recover instead of closing marine areas to achieve the same result. The ocean enhancement stamp collects funds to restock the once depleted white seabass adding to its long-term sustainability.
Recommendations;
a. Reduce current fish take limits by 50%.
b. Create special take tags & conditions to allow fishing in MLPA ($40/season and reinvest in stocking programs to assist recovery) instead of “off-limit” closures.
c. Put more DFG agents on the water to regulate and enact higher penalties, i.e. loss of boat, and/or fishing rights in the State on first offenses.
My only recourse in the event that the MLPAs go into effect is to adversely affect an already fragile economy by selling my boat, which will stop the following revenue streams annually totaling $6600 for the State of CA;
a. DMV license, title reg, and County property taxes ($1k/year)
b. Stop fishing which will stop DFG revenue ($100/year)
c. Stop revenue streams for boating and fishing industry products & services ($5k/year).
d. Stop insurance ($500/year).
April 1, 2009, 7:35 PM
jerry from la mirada ca wrote Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, to say :
I am writing to encourage you to NOT support MPA initiatives that close any ocean space to recreational use for the following reasons:
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS Section 25.
The people shall have the right to fish upon and from the public lands of the State and in the waters thereof, excepting upon lands set aside for fish hatcheries, and no land owned by the State shall ever be sold or transferred without reserving in the people the absolute right to fish thereupon; and no law shall ever be passed making it a crime for the people to enter upon the public lands within this State for the purpose of fishing in any water containing fish that have been planted therein by the State; provided, that the legislature may by statute, provide for the season when and the conditions under which the different species of fish may be taken.
• Fish Stocks in this area have been sustainable without protection for years and will not significantly benefit from protection
• Closing fishing areas forces more concentrated fishing activity into areas with greater amounts of environmental impact
• Rocky Point, Point Loma, La Jolla, and recreational Ocean area have a long rich fishing history which is part of our local cultural heritage
• Closure of these areas would have a devastating financial effect on the local industries that depend on year-round revenues generated thru recreational and commercial fishing.
April 1, 2009, 5:29 PM
Lance Valle from San Juan Capistrano, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
I am an avid fisherman with 2 young boys. Fishing together is one of the things we all look forward to the most. I am teaching them to be respectful of the ocean and only keep what we will use, the same way I was taught when I was a kid. All the fisherman I know abide by this same philosophy and do there part to protect our waters and keep them clean. Don't let a few spoiled apples ruin a family tradition that so many of us share with our children. They deserve to experience and enjoy what so many of us have made a way of life.
Sincerely,
Lance Valle
March 30, 2009, 2:49 PM
Corey Wyrick from San Diego, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
In considering the MLPAs in Southern California, please take into consideration that La Jolla is the most accessible ocean access to kayak fishermen, which are the least negatively impactful group on the ecosystem. If La Jolla is closed, the boaters will simply go elsewhwere to fish for inshore species, however kayakers (who have limited range, and limited ability to launch through large surf) will have no reliable beach launch to access the inshore fishery. Also, La Jolla's rich ecosystem, provided by the upwelling of nutrients from La Jolla canyon, is much more sustainable than those of nearby Del Mar and Point Loma. I suggest that the closures of Del Mar, and possibly also Point Loma kelp beds will be a much better alternative to closing the rest of La Jolla to fishing.
Many kayak anglers feel that because we are non polluting, and tend to be more environmentally concious than other groups (with less potential to decimate fish stocks) that non-motorized inshore marine parks may be another solution to keep our coastal access and protect our coastal marine ecosystem. Some areas which are closed to fishing to motorized vessels could be left open to human-powered vessels only. This would solve kayakers problems of limited coastal access while still having a favoable impact on the marine ecosystem by restricting fishing from motorized vessels, which have the most negative impact.
Tighter regulations, such as closed seasons on particular species, reduced bag limits, changes in size limits(i.e. slot limits), and catch & release only (no take) zones are all alternatives to closing areas to fishing altogether.
There are many alternatives to complete closures which should be explored. I hope that you will take all factors into consideration in this decision making process.
March 26, 2009, 5:42 PM
Derek Koopman from Dana Point, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Keep it LEGAL!!
March 25, 2009, 8:05 PM
Kelsea from Dana Point, CA wrote yesfishing.org, to say :
To the designers of this site:
I just wanted to thank you for designing such a wonderful resource!
Yours,
Kelsea
Spearfishing lady and ocean user
March 25, 2009, 12:43 PM
GEoff from Laguna Beach wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
My kid and I started Kayak fishing a couple years ago out in the waters of Laguna and La Jolla. I am very concerned about the proposed closure maps I have been seeing on the internet and at meetings. I understand that the large commercial fishing boats may make an impact on fisheries but I dont feel that my kid and I on a kayak do.
We catch a couple fish when we are lucky and even then we release all of them. I would really appreciate your help to stop these closures which we have created these memories. Even a limited take or catch and release would help.
Thank you
March 23, 2009, 8:27 PM
Paul Baumann from San Diego, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Please do not take away our coastal fishing grounds. There are other solutions besides total closure. How would you feel is the gov't closed your golf course???
I am an avid kayak fisherman and this is a way of life for me and countless others who take care of our ocean. We do not pollute and only take what will feed our families. Why not consider catch and release policies or even stricter limits. Maybe even reduce the fishing season on certain species.
Fishing is the number one recreational activity in the USA. Let's not ruin this.
May 8, 2009, 12:33 AM
Jerry Cirder from Unknown wrote Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
jerry corder from la mirada ca wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
To whom it may concern,
I have been fishing southern California’s coastline for 18 years as a responsible angler whom actively practices safe catch and release, and harvests much less than the current slot limits allow. Doing so, I feel I actively contribute to a sustainable fishery, which is the intent of protectionism, the “P” in MLPA.
Acts such as the MLPA penalize responsible saltwater recreational users, i.e. boaters, divers, and anglers by creating an “off-limits” of an ecosystem all the while damaging and ignoring the economic engines that could be used to support active protection and recovery programs for targeted ecosystems, and species within them.
Examples; The black sea bass was fished to near extinction in southern CA, however the DFG enacted a no take law to have it recover instead of closing marine areas to achieve the same result. The ocean enhancement stamp collects funds to restock the once depleted white seabass adding to its long-term sustainability.
Recommendations;
a. Reduce current fish take limits by 50%.
b. Create special take tags & conditions to allow fishing in MLPA ($40/season and reinvest in stocking programs to assist recovery) instead of “off-limit” closures.
c. Put more DFG agents on the water to regulate and enact higher penalties, i.e. loss of boat, and/or fishing rights in the State on first offenses.
My only recourse in the event that the MLPAs go into effect is to adversely affect an already fragile economy by selling my boat, which will stop the following revenue streams annually totaling $6600 for the State of CA;
a. DMV license, title reg, and County property taxes ($1k/year)
b. Stop fishing which will stop DFG revenue ($100/year)
c. Stop revenue streams for boating and fishing industry products & services ($5k/year).
d. Stop insurance ($500/year).
jerry corder from la mirada ca wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
To whom it may concern,
I have been fishing southern California’s coastline for 18 years as a responsible angler whom actively practices safe catch and release, and harvests much less than the current slot limits allow. Doing so, I feel I actively contribute to a sustainable fishery, which is the intent of protectionism, the “P” in MLPA.
Acts such as the MLPA penalize responsible saltwater recreational users, i.e. boaters, divers, and anglers by creating an “off-limits” of an ecosystem all the while damaging and ignoring the economic engines that could be used to support active protection and recovery programs for targeted ecosystems, and species within them.
Examples; The black sea bass was fished to near extinction in southern CA, however the DFG enacted a no take law to have it recover instead of closing marine areas to achieve the same result. The ocean enhancement stamp collects funds to restock the once depleted white seabass adding to its long-term sustainability.
Recommendations;
a. Reduce current fish take limits by 50%.
b. Create special take tags & conditions to allow fishing in MLPA ($40/season and reinvest in stocking programs to assist recovery) instead of “off-limit” closures.
c. Put more DFG agents on the water to regulate and enact higher penalties, i.e. loss of boat, and/or fishing rights in the State on first offenses.
My only recourse in the event that the MLPAs go into effect is to adversely affect an already fragile economy by selling my boat, which will stop the following revenue streams annually totaling $6600 for the State of CA;
a. DMV license, title reg, and County property taxes ($1k/year)
b. Stop fishing which will stop DFG revenue ($100/year)
c. Stop revenue streams for boating and fishing industry products & services ($5k/year).
d. Stop insurance ($500/year).
jerry corder from la mirada ca wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
To whom it may concern,
I have been fishing southern California’s coastline for 18 years as a responsible angler whom actively practices safe catch and release, and harvests much less than the current slot limits allow. Doing so, I feel I actively contribute to a sustainable fishery, which is the intent of protectionism, the “P” in MLPA.
Acts such as the MLPA penalize responsible saltwater recreational users, i.e. boaters, divers, and anglers by creating an “off-limits” of an ecosystem all the while damaging and ignoring the economic engines that could be used to support active protection and recovery programs for targeted ecosystems, and species within them.
Examples; The black sea bass was fished to near extinction in southern CA, however the DFG enacted a no take law to have it recover instead of closing marine areas to achieve the same result. The ocean enhancement stamp collects funds to restock the once depleted white seabass adding to its long-term sustainability.
Recommendations;
a. Reduce current fish take limits by 50%.
b. Create special take tags & conditions to allow fishing in MLPA ($40/season and reinvest in stocking programs to assist recovery) instead of “off-limit” closures.
c. Put more DFG agents on the water to regulate and enact higher penalties, i.e. loss of boat, and/or fishing rights in the State on first offenses.
My only recourse in the event that the MLPAs go into effect is to adversely affect an already fragile economy by selling my boat, which will stop the following revenue streams annually totaling $6600 for the State of CA;
a. DMV license, title reg, and County property taxes ($1k/year)
b. Stop fishing which will stop DFG revenue ($100/year)
c. Stop revenue streams for boating and fishing industry products & services ($5k/year).
d. Stop insurance ($500/year).
May 8, 2009, 12:31 AM
Ron Twardowski from Unknown wrote Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
Ron Twardowski from Downey,Ca. wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
To everyone, I have been concerned with the accuracy of any reports of how recreational fishing has impacted our local fisheries for some time. When you go out of the Long Beach Harbor, there are still gill nets set and I am sure that they take the majority of large halibut, white sea bass, sharks , and rays. With the economy as it, many recreational fishermen, are going out less and therefore not taking as many fish.Our regulators should look at were the info comes from and verify the accuracy of it. It seems that the government wants to take the path of least resistance , I hope all fisherman see that and voice an opinion. Do not support the MLPA initiative
May 8, 2009, 12:35 AM
jerry corder from Unknown wrote Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
I have been fishing southern California’s coastline for 18 years as a responsible angler whom actively practices safe catch and release, and harvests much less than the current slot limits allow. Doing so, I feel I actively contribute to a sustainable fishery, which is the intent of protectionism, the “P” in MLPA.
Acts such as the MLPA penalize responsible saltwater recreational users, i.e. boaters, divers, and anglers by creating an “off-limits” of an ecosystem all the while damaging and ignoring the economic engines that could be used to support active protection and recovery programs for targeted ecosystems, and species within them.
Examples; The black sea bass was fished to near extinction in southern CA, however the DFG enacted a no take law to have it recover instead of closing marine areas to achieve the same result. The ocean enhancement stamp collects funds to restock the once depleted white seabass adding to its long-term sustainability.
Recommendations;
a. Reduce current fish take limits by 50%.
b. Create special take tags & conditions to allow fishing in MLPA ($40/season and reinvest in stocking programs to assist recovery) instead of “off-limit” closures.
c. Put more DFG agents on the water to regulate and enact higher penalties, i.e. loss of boat, and/or fishing rights in the State on first offenses.
My only recourse in the event that the MLPAs go into effect is to adversely affect an already fragile economy by selling my boat, which will stop the following revenue streams annually totaling $6600 for the State of CA;
a. DMV license, title reg, and County property taxes ($1k/year)
b. Stop fishing which will stop DFG revenue ($100/year)
c. Stop revenue streams for boating and fishing industry products & services ($5k/year).
d. Stop insurance ($500/year).
April 1, 2009, 7:35 PM
jerry from la mirada ca wrote Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, to say :
I am writing to encourage you to NOT support MPA initiatives that close any ocean space to recreational use for the following reasons:
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS Section 25.
The people shall have the right to fish upon and from the public lands of the State and in the waters thereof, excepting upon lands set aside for fish hatcheries, and no land owned by the State shall ever be sold or transferred without reserving in the people the absolute right to fish thereupon; and no law shall ever be passed making it a crime for the people to enter upon the public lands within this State for the purpose of fishing in any water containing fish that have been planted therein by the State; provided, that the legislature may by statute, provide for the season when and the conditions under which the different species of fish may be taken.
• Fish Stocks in this area have been sustainable without protection for years and will not significantly benefit from protection
• Closing fishing areas forces more concentrated fishing activity into areas with greater amounts of environmental impact
• Rocky Point, Point Loma, La Jolla, and recreational Ocean area have a long rich fishing history which is part of our local cultural heritage
• Closure of these areas would have a devastating financial effect on the local industries that depend on year-round revenues generated thru recreational and commercial fishing.
April 1, 2009, 5:29 PM
Lance Valle from San Juan Capistrano, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
I am an avid fisherman with 2 young boys. Fishing together is one of the things we all look forward to the most. I am teaching them to be respectful of the ocean and only keep what we will use, the same way I was taught when I was a kid. All the fisherman I know abide by this same philosophy and do there part to protect our waters and keep them clean. Don't let a few spoiled apples ruin a family tradition that so many of us share with our children. They deserve to experience and enjoy what so many of us have made a way of life.
Sincerely,
Lance Valle
March 30, 2009, 2:49 PM
Corey Wyrick from San Diego, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
In considering the MLPAs in Southern California, please take into consideration that La Jolla is the most accessible ocean access to kayak fishermen, which are the least negatively impactful group on the ecosystem. If La Jolla is closed, the boaters will simply go elsewhwere to fish for inshore species, however kayakers (who have limited range, and limited ability to launch through large surf) will have no reliable beach launch to access the inshore fishery. Also, La Jolla's rich ecosystem, provided by the upwelling of nutrients from La Jolla canyon, is much more sustainable than those of nearby Del Mar and Point Loma. I suggest that the closures of Del Mar, and possibly also Point Loma kelp beds will be a much better alternative to closing the rest of La Jolla to fishing.
Many kayak anglers feel that because we are non polluting, and tend to be more environmentally concious than other groups (with less potential to decimate fish stocks) that non-motorized inshore marine parks may be another solution to keep our coastal access and protect our coastal marine ecosystem. Some areas which are closed to fishing to motorized vessels could be left open to human-powered vessels only. This would solve kayakers problems of limited coastal access while still having a favoable impact on the marine ecosystem by restricting fishing from motorized vessels, which have the most negative impact.
Tighter regulations, such as closed seasons on particular species, reduced bag limits, changes in size limits(i.e. slot limits), and catch & release only (no take) zones are all alternatives to closing areas to fishing altogether.
There are many alternatives to complete closures which should be explored. I hope that you will take all factors into consideration in this decision making process.
March 26, 2009, 5:42 PM
Derek Koopman from Dana Point, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Keep it LEGAL!!
March 25, 2009, 8:05 PM
Kelsea from Dana Point, CA wrote yesfishing.org, to say :
To the designers of this site:
I just wanted to thank you for designing such a wonderful resource!
Yours,
Kelsea
Spearfishing lady and ocean user
March 25, 2009, 12:43 PM
GEoff from Laguna Beach wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
My kid and I started Kayak fishing a couple years ago out in the waters of Laguna and La Jolla. I am very concerned about the proposed closure maps I have been seeing on the internet and at meetings. I understand that the large commercial fishing boats may make an impact on fisheries but I dont feel that my kid and I on a kayak do.
We catch a couple fish when we are lucky and even then we release all of them. I would really appreciate your help to stop these closures which we have created these memories. Even a limited take or catch and release would help.
Thank you
March 23, 2009, 8:27 PM
Paul Baumann from San Diego, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Please do not take away our coastal fishing grounds. There are other solutions besides total closure. How would you feel is the gov't closed your golf course???
I am an avid kayak fisherman and this is a way of life for me and countless others who take care of our ocean. We do not pollute and only take what will feed our families. Why not consider catch and release policies or even stricter limits. Maybe even reduce the fishing season on certain species.
Fishing is the number one recreational activity in the USA. Let's not ruin this.
May 8, 2009, 12:33 AM
Jerry Cirder from Unknown wrote Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
jerry corder from la mirada ca wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
To whom it may concern,
I have been fishing southern California’s coastline for 18 years as a responsible angler whom actively practices safe catch and release, and harvests much less than the current slot limits allow. Doing so, I feel I actively contribute to a sustainable fishery, which is the intent of protectionism, the “P” in MLPA.
Acts such as the MLPA penalize responsible saltwater recreational users, i.e. boaters, divers, and anglers by creating an “off-limits” of an ecosystem all the while damaging and ignoring the economic engines that could be used to support active protection and recovery programs for targeted ecosystems, and species within them.
Examples; The black sea bass was fished to near extinction in southern CA, however the DFG enacted a no take law to have it recover instead of closing marine areas to achieve the same result. The ocean enhancement stamp collects funds to restock the once depleted white seabass adding to its long-term sustainability.
Recommendations;
a. Reduce current fish take limits by 50%.
b. Create special take tags & conditions to allow fishing in MLPA ($40/season and reinvest in stocking programs to assist recovery) instead of “off-limit” closures.
c. Put more DFG agents on the water to regulate and enact higher penalties, i.e. loss of boat, and/or fishing rights in the State on first offenses.
My only recourse in the event that the MLPAs go into effect is to adversely affect an already fragile economy by selling my boat, which will stop the following revenue streams annually totaling $6600 for the State of CA;
a. DMV license, title reg, and County property taxes ($1k/year)
b. Stop fishing which will stop DFG revenue ($100/year)
c. Stop revenue streams for boating and fishing industry products & services ($5k/year).
d. Stop insurance ($500/year).
jerry corder from la mirada ca wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
To whom it may concern,
I have been fishing southern California’s coastline for 18 years as a responsible angler whom actively practices safe catch and release, and harvests much less than the current slot limits allow. Doing so, I feel I actively contribute to a sustainable fishery, which is the intent of protectionism, the “P” in MLPA.
Acts such as the MLPA penalize responsible saltwater recreational users, i.e. boaters, divers, and anglers by creating an “off-limits” of an ecosystem all the while damaging and ignoring the economic engines that could be used to support active protection and recovery programs for targeted ecosystems, and species within them.
Examples; The black sea bass was fished to near extinction in southern CA, however the DFG enacted a no take law to have it recover instead of closing marine areas to achieve the same result. The ocean enhancement stamp collects funds to restock the once depleted white seabass adding to its long-term sustainability.
Recommendations;
a. Reduce current fish take limits by 50%.
b. Create special take tags & conditions to allow fishing in MLPA ($40/season and reinvest in stocking programs to assist recovery) instead of “off-limit” closures.
c. Put more DFG agents on the water to regulate and enact higher penalties, i.e. loss of boat, and/or fishing rights in the State on first offenses.
My only recourse in the event that the MLPAs go into effect is to adversely affect an already fragile economy by selling my boat, which will stop the following revenue streams annually totaling $6600 for the State of CA;
a. DMV license, title reg, and County property taxes ($1k/year)
b. Stop fishing which will stop DFG revenue ($100/year)
c. Stop revenue streams for boating and fishing industry products & services ($5k/year).
d. Stop insurance ($500/year).
jerry corder from la mirada ca wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
To whom it may concern,
I have been fishing southern California’s coastline for 18 years as a responsible angler whom actively practices safe catch and release, and harvests much less than the current slot limits allow. Doing so, I feel I actively contribute to a sustainable fishery, which is the intent of protectionism, the “P” in MLPA.
Acts such as the MLPA penalize responsible saltwater recreational users, i.e. boaters, divers, and anglers by creating an “off-limits” of an ecosystem all the while damaging and ignoring the economic engines that could be used to support active protection and recovery programs for targeted ecosystems, and species within them.
Examples; The black sea bass was fished to near extinction in southern CA, however the DFG enacted a no take law to have it recover instead of closing marine areas to achieve the same result. The ocean enhancement stamp collects funds to restock the once depleted white seabass adding to its long-term sustainability.
Recommendations;
a. Reduce current fish take limits by 50%.
b. Create special take tags & conditions to allow fishing in MLPA ($40/season and reinvest in stocking programs to assist recovery) instead of “off-limit” closures.
c. Put more DFG agents on the water to regulate and enact higher penalties, i.e. loss of boat, and/or fishing rights in the State on first offenses.
My only recourse in the event that the MLPAs go into effect is to adversely affect an already fragile economy by selling my boat, which will stop the following revenue streams annually totaling $6600 for the State of CA;
a. DMV license, title reg, and County property taxes ($1k/year)
b. Stop fishing which will stop DFG revenue ($100/year)
c. Stop revenue streams for boating and fishing industry products & services ($5k/year).
d. Stop insurance ($500/year).
May 8, 2009, 12:31 AM
Ron Twardowski from Unknown wrote Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
Ron Twardowski from Downey,Ca. wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
To everyone, I have been concerned with the accuracy of any reports of how recreational fishing has impacted our local fisheries for some time. When you go out of the Long Beach Harbor, there are still gill nets set and I am sure that they take the majority of large halibut, white sea bass, sharks , and rays. With the economy as it, many recreational fishermen, are going out less and therefore not taking as many fish.Our regulators should look at were the info comes from and verify the accuracy of it. It seems that the government wants to take the path of least resistance , I hope all fisherman see that and voice an opinion. Do not support the MLPA initiative
May 8, 2009, 12:29 AM
GEoff from Unknown wrote Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
GEoff from Laguna Beach wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
My kid and I started Kayak fishing a couple years ago out in the waters of Laguna and La Jolla. I am very concerned about the proposed closure maps I have been seeing on the internet and at meetings. I understand that the large commercial fishing boats may make an impact on fisheries but I dont feel that my kid and I on a kayak do.
We catch a couple fish when we are lucky and even then we release all of them. I would really appreciate your help to stop these closures which we have created these memories. Even a limited take or catch and release would help.
Thank you
May 8, 2009, 12:27 AM
Paul Baumann from San Diego, CA wrote Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Paul Baumann from San Diego, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Please do not take away our coastal fishing grounds. There are other solutions besides total closure. How would you feel is the gov\'t closed your golf course???
I am an avid kayak fisherman and this is a way of life for me and countless others who take care of our ocean. We do not pollute and only take what will feed our families. Why not consider catch and release policies or even stricter limits. Maybe even reduce the fishing season on certain species.
Fishing is the number one recreational activity in the USA. Let\'s not ruin this
May 8, 2009, 12:24 AM
Dave Terman from Unknown wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, to say :
To whom it may concern,
I am once again shocked at the reckless behavior of our government for allowing the MLPA to propose such a threat to our already fragile economy.
The proprosal to close such a wide area of SoCal\\\\\\\'s recreational fishing grounds is niave at best and punative at it\\\\\\\'s worst. Closing such a wide area of the publics fishing will have an economic impact on coastal communities much larger than most realize. Not having access to quality fishing grounds will virtually eliminate the following from our economy and state tax roll: marina fees, boat sales, boating related products, fishing licenses, insurance, property taxes on my boats, DMV fees, boat repair, marina infastructure enjoyed by non boaters would quickly fall into disrepair without the financial support of boaters and fisherman.
How about lower limits on all species? A few years ago, black sea bass were regulated as a no take species by the DFG. Now they have come back and they are everywhere. Fisherman supported the black sea bass project and it worked because of that support.
Please do not support the MLPA\\\\\\\'s initiative to destroy our economy and our American way of life.
May 8, 2009, 12:19 AM
James South from Unknown wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
I am writing to encourage you to NOT support MPA initiatives that close any ocean space to recreational use for the following reasons:
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS Section 25.
The people shall have the right to fish upon and from the public lands of the State and in the waters thereof, excepting upon lands set aside for fish hatcheries, and no land owned by the State shall ever be sold or transferred without reserving in the people the absolute right to fish thereupon; and no law shall ever be passed making it a crime for the people to enter upon the public lands within this State for the purpose of fishing in any water containing fish that have been planted therein by the State; provided, that the legislature may by statute, provide for the season when and the conditions under which the different species of fish may be taken.
• Fish Stocks in this area have been sustainable without protection for years and will not significantly benefit from protection
• Closing fishing areas forces more concentrated fishing activity into areas with greater amounts of environmental impact
• Rocky Point, Point Loma, La Jolla, and recreational Ocean area have a long rich fishing history which is part of our local cultural heritage
• Closure of these areas would have a devastating financial effect on the local industries that depend on year-round revenues generated thru recreational and commercial fishing.
May 8, 2009, 12:13 AM
James from Steele wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
Living in Orange County, I strongly support the protection of marine habitat around the coasts. The clean environment and the protection of marine life is honorable. I appreciate the Californian Senator for supporting the MLPA to provide us with clean, protected environment.
May 7, 2009, 10:45 PM
Leanna Yoshimura from Costa Mesa, CA wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
Dear MLPA
I am writing to you to discuss about protection of marine life in Southern Californian coasts.
I have been living in Orange County, California for about a year now, I love this place, especially the beaches. The beaches here are sanitary and are environmentally friendly, therefore I would like to thank the members of MLPA for giving the marine life some protections from hazardous things.
With the help of MLPA, I and aswell as the citizens of Southern California are content about the protected areas, which makes the business involving marine and activities we do at the ocean efficient.I am also content that, this process protects the endangered species, the habitats, and the food chain of the marine animals and ocean from becoming polluted.
I appreciate all the support from MLPA’s protestations of the marine lifes and offering a healthy community around the coasts.
Sincerely,
Leanna Yoshimura
May 3, 2009, 3:31 AM
Mitchelle Jon Plouffe from Huntington Beach, Calif wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
To whom it may concern,
I have been an active, responsible fisherman in this state for almost my entire life-38 years. Fishing our waters inshore and offshore has been a family tradition and heritage that has been passed on from generation to generation. I am appalled that I may not get the opportunity to pass on my families traditions to my son, who is now 5.
How can our government sanction a process that is estimated to cost $35 million annually? Where are the state's priority's?
What is even more upsetting is when I see school teachers and other state employees being handed pink slips. State employees being asked to take pay cuts instead of lay offs. Our state is robbing Peter to pay Paul.
For $35 million annually, the state could hire 500 new DFG officers to help patrol our coastline. That is with a $60k a year salary; generous for our state, with change to spare for costs.
Lower the daily limits on fish. For those in danger, impose moratoriums. Most of the recreational fishermen and women I know practice catch and release so lower limits would not impose on us very much.
Please do not support the MPLA's.
April 9, 2009, 5:22 PM
Ron Twardowski from Downey,Ca. wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
To everyone, I have been concerned with the accuracy of any reports of how recreational fishing has impacted our local fisheries for some time. When you go out of the Long Beach Harbor, there are still gill nets set and I am sure that they take the majority of large halibut, white sea bass, sharks , and rays. With the economy as it, many recreational fishermen, are going out less and therefore not taking as many fish.Our regulators should look at were the info comes from and verify the accuracy of it. It seems that the government wants to take the path of least resistance , I hope all fisherman see that and voice an opinion. Do not support the MLPA initiative
April 9, 2009, 1:37 PM
Chris Badinelli from Huntington Beach, CA wrote yesfishing.org, Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
It is criminal that any group would attempt to close any recreational fishing. It is evident that the decrease to the local fish population comes from the presents of commercial fishing practices. These areas should be closed to all commercial fishing and a decrease of limits to recreational fishing would show a dramatic effect to the fish population of local waters. Special interest and a small minority are pushing for these changes against the rights of the people if this state.
The 1999 Fisheries Act allocated a projected annual cost of 250k and once again the California tax payers have been bamboozled with an increase in this project to a staggering 35 mil estimated annual cost. At a time when 26,500 public school teachers in California and an additional 15,000 bus drivers, janitors, secretaries and administrators will have been handed pink slips it is evident that the States politicians have their priorities wrong.
April 6, 2009, 12:29 PM
Dave Terman from Westminster, CA wrote Pro-Fishing State Senators, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
To whom it may concern,
I am once again shocked at the reckless behavior of our government for allowing the MLPA to propose such a threat to our already fragile economy.
The proprosal to close such a wide area of SoCal's recreational fishing grounds is niave at best and punative at it's worst. Closing such a wide area of the publics fishing will have an economic impact on coastal communities much larger than most realize. Not having access to quality fishing grounds will virtually eliminate the following from our economy and state tax roll: marina fees, boat sales, boating related products, fishing licenses, insurance, property taxes on my boats, DMV fees, boat repair, marina infastructure enjoyed by non boaters would quickly fall into disrepair without the financial support of boaters and fisherman.
How about lower limits on all species? A few years ago, black sea bass were regulated as a no take species by the DFG. Now they have come back and they are everywhere. Fisherman supported the black sea bass project and it worked because of that support.
Please do not support the MLPA's initiative to destroy our economy and our American way of life.
April 1, 2009, 7:39 PM
jerry corder from la mirada ca wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), to say :
To whom it may concern,
I have been fishing southern California’s coastline for 18 years as a responsible angler whom actively practices safe catch and release, and harvests much less than the current slot limits allow. Doing so, I feel I actively contribute to a sustainable fishery, which is the intent of protectionism, the “P” in MLPA.
Acts such as the MLPA penalize responsible saltwater recreational users, i.e. boaters, divers, and anglers by creating an “off-limits” of an ecosystem all the while damaging and ignoring the economic engines that could be used to support active protection and recovery programs for targeted ecosystems, and species within them.
Examples; The black sea bass was fished to near extinction in southern CA, however the DFG enacted a no take law to have it recover instead of closing marine areas to achieve the same result. The ocean enhancement stamp collects funds to restock the once depleted white seabass adding to its long-term sustainability.
Recommendations;
a. Reduce current fish take limits by 50%.
b. Create special take tags & conditions to allow fishing in MLPA ($40/season and reinvest in stocking programs to assist recovery) instead of “off-limit” closures.
c. Put more DFG agents on the water to regulate and enact higher penalties, i.e. loss of boat, and/or fishing rights in the State on first offenses.
My only recourse in the event that the MLPAs go into effect is to adversely affect an already fragile economy by selling my boat, which will stop the following revenue streams annually totaling $6600 for the State of CA;
a. DMV license, title reg, and County property taxes ($1k/year)
b. Stop fishing which will stop DFG revenue ($100/year)
c. Stop revenue streams for boating and fishing industry products & services ($5k/year).
d. Stop insurance ($500/year).
April 1, 2009, 7:38 PM
jerry from la mirada ca wrote California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
To whom it may concern,
I have been fishing southern California’s coastline for 18 years as a responsible angler whom actively practices safe catch and release, and harvests much less than the current slot limits allow. Doing so, I feel I actively contribute to a sustainable fishery, which is the intent of protectionism, the “P” in MLPA.
Acts such as the MLPA penalize responsible saltwater recreational users, i.e. boaters, divers, and anglers by creating an “off-limits” of an ecosystem all the while damaging and ignoring the economic engines that could be used to support active protection and recovery programs for targeted ecosystems, and species within them.
Examples; The black sea bass was fished to near extinction in southern CA, however the DFG enacted a no take law to have it recover instead of closing marine areas to achieve the same result. The ocean enhancement stamp collects funds to restock the once depleted white seabass adding to its long-term sustainability.
Recommendations;
a. Reduce current fish take limits by 50%.
b. Create special take tags & conditions to allow fishing in MLPA ($40/season and reinvest in stocking programs to assist recovery) instead of “off-limit” closures.
c. Put more DFG agents on the water to regulate and enact higher penalties, i.e. loss of boat, and/or fishing rights in the State on first offenses.
My only recourse in the event that the MLPAs go into effect is to adversely affect an already fragile economy by selling my boat, which will stop the following revenue streams annually totaling $6600 for the State of CA;
a. DMV license, title reg, and County property taxes ($1k/year)
b. Stop fishing which will stop DFG revenue ($100/year)
c. Stop revenue streams for boating and fishing industry products & services ($5k/year).
d. Stop insurance ($500/year).
April 1, 2009, 7:35 PM
jerry from la mirada ca wrote Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, to say :
I am writing to encourage you to NOT support MPA initiatives that close any ocean space to recreational use for the following reasons:
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS Section 25.
The people shall have the right to fish upon and from the public lands of the State and in the waters thereof, excepting upon lands set aside for fish hatcheries, and no land owned by the State shall ever be sold or transferred without reserving in the people the absolute right to fish thereupon; and no law shall ever be passed making it a crime for the people to enter upon the public lands within this State for the purpose of fishing in any water containing fish that have been planted therein by the State; provided, that the legislature may by statute, provide for the season when and the conditions under which the different species of fish may be taken.
• Fish Stocks in this area have been sustainable without protection for years and will not significantly benefit from protection
• Closing fishing areas forces more concentrated fishing activity into areas with greater amounts of environmental impact
• Rocky Point, Point Loma, La Jolla, and recreational Ocean area have a long rich fishing history which is part of our local cultural heritage
• Closure of these areas would have a devastating financial effect on the local industries that depend on year-round revenues generated thru recreational and commercial fishing.
April 1, 2009, 5:29 PM
Lance Valle from San Juan Capistrano, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
I am an avid fisherman with 2 young boys. Fishing together is one of the things we all look forward to the most. I am teaching them to be respectful of the ocean and only keep what we will use, the same way I was taught when I was a kid. All the fisherman I know abide by this same philosophy and do there part to protect our waters and keep them clean. Don't let a few spoiled apples ruin a family tradition that so many of us share with our children. They deserve to experience and enjoy what so many of us have made a way of life.
Sincerely,
Lance Valle
March 30, 2009, 2:49 PM
Corey Wyrick from San Diego, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
In considering the MLPAs in Southern California, please take into consideration that La Jolla is the most accessible ocean access to kayak fishermen, which are the least negatively impactful group on the ecosystem. If La Jolla is closed, the boaters will simply go elsewhwere to fish for inshore species, however kayakers (who have limited range, and limited ability to launch through large surf) will have no reliable beach launch to access the inshore fishery. Also, La Jolla's rich ecosystem, provided by the upwelling of nutrients from La Jolla canyon, is much more sustainable than those of nearby Del Mar and Point Loma. I suggest that the closures of Del Mar, and possibly also Point Loma kelp beds will be a much better alternative to closing the rest of La Jolla to fishing.
Many kayak anglers feel that because we are non polluting, and tend to be more environmentally concious than other groups (with less potential to decimate fish stocks) that non-motorized inshore marine parks may be another solution to keep our coastal access and protect our coastal marine ecosystem. Some areas which are closed to fishing to motorized vessels could be left open to human-powered vessels only. This would solve kayakers problems of limited coastal access while still having a favoable impact on the marine ecosystem by restricting fishing from motorized vessels, which have the most negative impact.
Tighter regulations, such as closed seasons on particular species, reduced bag limits, changes in size limits(i.e. slot limits), and catch & release only (no take) zones are all alternatives to closing areas to fishing altogether.
There are many alternatives to complete closures which should be explored. I hope that you will take all factors into consideration in this decision making process.
March 26, 2009, 5:42 PM
Derek Koopman from Dana Point, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Keep it LEGAL!!
March 25, 2009, 8:05 PM
Kelsea from Dana Point, CA wrote yesfishing.org, to say :
To the designers of this site:
I just wanted to thank you for designing such a wonderful resource!
Yours,
Kelsea
Spearfishing lady and ocean user
March 25, 2009, 12:43 PM
GEoff from Laguna Beach wrote MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
My kid and I started Kayak fishing a couple years ago out in the waters of Laguna and La Jolla. I am very concerned about the proposed closure maps I have been seeing on the internet and at meetings. I understand that the large commercial fishing boats may make an impact on fisheries but I dont feel that my kid and I on a kayak do.
We catch a couple fish when we are lucky and even then we release all of them. I would really appreciate your help to stop these closures which we have created these memories. Even a limited take or catch and release would help.
Thank you
March 23, 2009, 8:27 PM
Paul Baumann from San Diego, CA wrote yesfishing.org, MLPA Initiative (comments are added to the public record), Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, California Secretary for Natural Resources Mike Chrisman, California Fish and Game Commission, to say :
Please do not take away our coastal fishing grounds. There are other solutions besides total closure. How would you feel is the gov't closed your golf course???
I am an avid kayak fisherman and this is a way of life for me and countless others who take care of our ocean. We do not pollute and only take what will feed our families. Why not consider catch and release policies or even stricter limits. Maybe even reduce the fishing season on certain species.
Fishing is the number one recreational activity in the USA. Let's not ruin this.
